Re: Atomic Workstation next steps

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 3:14 PM, Dennis Gilmore <dennis@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> El mar, 07-03-2017 a las 19:10 -0500, Josh Boyer escribió:
>> On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 5:33 PM, Dennis Gilmore <dennis@xxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>> > El mar, 07-03-2017 a las 14:08 -0500, Owen Taylor escribió:
>> > > On Tue, 2017-03-07 at 13:24 -0500, Owen Taylor wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > > I am just asking you to work with us, pay attention and fix
>> > > > > the
>> > > > > things that have been failing for months with no one looking
>> > > > > at
>> > > > > it.
>> > > > > Step one is getting it built once a day, because that does
>> > > > > not
>> > > > > happen
>> > > > > and has not in ages.
>> > > >
>> > > > I'm sorry it's been sitting there broken for so long. Certainly
>> > > > more
>> > > > people following the builds and more people trying out the
>> > > > result
>> > > > is
>> > > > really important, and we'll work towards that. The problem that
>> > > > it
>> > > > has been hitting was already fixed for Atomic Host, so I'll
>> > > > work on
>> > > > a
>> > > > pull-request to copy those changes over.
>> > >
>> > > I believe:
>> > >
>> > > https://pagure.io/fedora-lorax-templates/pull-request/13
>> > > https://pagure.io/fedora-lorax-templates/pull-request/14
>> > >
>> > > should get things working again, though it's not something I
>> > > could
>> > > easily test locally. As noted in the PR, matching changes to how
>> > > lorax
>> > > is invoked are needed.
>> > >
>> > > - Owen
>> >
>> > I can not merge the requests as the commits are not signed off on
>>
>> That project has no indication that commits must be signed off.  The
>> only thing there to suggest it would be previous commits.  However,
>> the Signed-off-by in those previous commit logs is literally
>> meaningless because there is nothing in the code base that describes
>> what it means.  You're just following a convention at this point, and
>> how is a developer supposed to know what he or she is signing off on?
>>
>> If the intention is to be using the DCO
>> (https://developercertificate.org/) then put that in the README.md
>> file, or COPYING, or something to at least give contributors some
>> idea
>> what the hell is going on.
>
> I have submitted a pull request updating the README.md
> https://pagure.io/fedora-lorax-templates/pull-request/15 there was
> never a intention to be vague. It was a oversight when we moved things
> to pagure. all of the release engineering controlled repos require
> commits to be signed off on in order to be using DCO

Thanks!

josh
_______________________________________________
desktop mailing list -- desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to desktop-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora KDE]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux