----- Original Message ----- > On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 3:31 PM Christian Schaller <cschalle@xxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > The general problem with this is that everyone got their own set of 'can't > > live without' extensions.he general problem with this is that everyone got > > their own set of 'can't live without' extensions. > > For example I know that Linus Torvalds got 3 GNOME Shell extensions he > > feels he can't live without. > > > > And I think that trying to add a generic 'add any extensions you want' UI > > to the installer seems like > > the wrong thing to do and adding a lot of 'risk' and complexity to the > > installer, especially > > as we have been wanting to streamline the installer experience, not expand > > it. > > > > Finally if we succeed in continuously improving our upgrade experience the > > amount of times you or anyone > > else should need to do a fresh install and thus lose your extensions > > should hopefully be quickly > > diminishing. > > > > Christian > > > > > Hi Christian, > > Doesn't the upgrade scenario imply a "no-regression" on the part of GS > extensions? > Is this something we we can really claim, given that mutter (or whatever > the GNOME compositor will be called), sooner or later, is going to have to > move to the gsk? It won't, that's why it has its own copy of clutter included. > BTW, this is a genuine question, as it's not clear to me either way:) > > Best/Liam > > _______________________________________________ > desktop mailing list -- desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to desktop-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > _______________________________________________ desktop mailing list -- desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to desktop-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
