Re: third-party repos (design and process) [was Re: Gnome-shell extenstions in Gnome-software]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]





On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 3:31 PM Christian Schaller <cschalle@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The general problem with this is that everyone got their own set of 'can't live without' extensions.he general problem with this is that everyone got their own set of 'can't live without' extensions.
For example I know that Linus Torvalds got 3 GNOME Shell extensions he feels he can't live without.

And I think that trying to add a generic 'add any extensions you want' UI to the installer seems like
the wrong thing to do and adding a lot of 'risk' and complexity to the installer, especially
as we have been wanting to streamline the installer experience, not expand it.

Finally if we succeed in continuously improving our upgrade experience the amount of times you or anyone
else should need to do a fresh install and thus lose your extensions should hopefully be quickly
diminishing.

Christian


Hi Christian,

Doesn't the upgrade scenario imply a "no-regression" on the part of GS extensions?
Is this something we we can really claim, given that mutter (or whatever the GNOME compositor will be called), sooner or later, is going to have to move to the gsk?
BTW, this is a genuine question, as it's not clear to me either way:)

Best/Liam
_______________________________________________
desktop mailing list -- desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to desktop-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora KDE]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux