On 14/09/16 11:22 AM, Jiri Eischmann wrote: > > I've used both virt-manager and Boxes and while you're right that the > user experience of virt-manager is pretty bad it's a tool that has > never failed on me unlike Boxes (people around me have similar > experience) + it covers pretty much all features required by power > users. > In the last LinuxVoice magazine virt-manager even won the contest of > desktop virtualization tools for Linux, so apparently others don't find > it so hopeless and not being a viable contender. > > And BTW Adding RDP support to Boxes is planned. > > Jiri > I heavily use Gnome Boxes on Fedora 24 for testing Design Suite. One of its benefits is the ease of use as I have less time to fully customize virt-manager and the nearly seemless setting. Granted bugs still occur like occasional flickering on some distributions. One of few elements Boxes needs is GPU passtrought, files sharing and remote connection (potential to replace vinagre)features and improved hardware acceleration. I agree with Adam that seemless integration of some features from virt-manager will be great. -- Luya Tshimbalanga Graphic & Web Designer E: luya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx W: http://www.coolest-storm.net _______________________________________________ desktop mailing list -- desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to desktop-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
