By the statements of this article, I have decided to install Chromium from fedora repositories. However, I have not had a good experience because there is no way and documentation about the (hated) proprietary multimedia codecs needed to have a good web experience.
Will they be added at an extra repository as RPM Fusion?. I have also seen with good eyes this project: https://github.com/Samsung/ChromiumGStreamerBackend
For now I'll stick with that offered by RussianFedoraRepo version.
--
Will they be added at an extra repository as RPM Fusion?. I have also seen with good eyes this project: https://github.com/Samsung/ChromiumGStreamerBackend
For now I'll stick with that offered by RussianFedoraRepo version.
2016-09-03 2:52 GMT-03:00 Adam Williamson <adamwill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
On Fri, 2016-09-02 at 22:37 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-08-30 at 20:35 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> >
> >
> > Of course it won't catch every issue, but it would help.... (And it
> > probably would not have caught this one: it was hardware-specific, and
> > not triggered until the next kernel upgrade, and so it took over a week
> > for the first bug report to appear.)
>
> We could probably improve this case quite easily with a package test
> case. I'll write one.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_microcode_ should showupdate
up for future microcode_ctl updates. In fact this should be an
interesting test of how Bodhi parses the test case page names, since I
think this is the first time we've done a package-specific test case
for a package with an underscore in its name. Let's see!
--
Hugo
-- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
