On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 03:07:19PM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: > Is "feature parity with X11" the intended measure of readiness here? > I thought there were specific X11 features that are intentionally not > going to be duplicated in Wayland, which would make that a false bar > to try to reach. We've been kind of selling it as "it's ready when most people won't notice". But I think we should nail down a precise bar. (Hmmm. Mixed metaphor.) > We do have this existing feature page: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/WaylandByDefault Yeah — and that's a really great, useful thing. I'd _really_ love if there were a "good enough!" criterion listed for each feature, agreed on formally by the WG. [...] > "Use the desktop normally, and verify that there are no obvious > instabilities, or Wayland-specific bugs or performance problems" > "No Wayland-specific bugs" also doesn't appear to jibe with the desire Maybe "No Wayland-specific bugs which would qualify as blockers on their own", or something? -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
