On 07/19/2016 09:29 PM, Bastián Díaz wrote: > El 14-07-2016 09:21, Stephen Gallagher escribió: >> >> >> Just to note, the Cockpit administrative console supports tuned as "performance >> profiles". They already have quite a few prebuilt profiles. Maybe working with >> them would be a better choice than working on tuned-gtk, as it's already a more >> modern interface and it works across all of the Editions (notably Server and >> Cloud which are generally headless and therefore wouldn't really be good about >> running a GTK app). >> >> (see attached screenshot) >> >> > > My idea aims to integrate this tool in the fedora desktop (workstation), so the > prospect of "cockpit" differs with this idea because it is a control center > created to manage servers through a web interface. I think that's an incorrect statement. Cockpit is a really good tool for managing any Linux system, it's just *ideal* for managing headless systems. My point was that since a graphical tool to do most of what you want 1) already exists and 2) already has a .desktop file so it can be launched from a graphical desktop, it makes more sense to collaborate on making that project better rather than reimplementing its functionality in a far more limited, desktop-only manner. A simple perspective to > switch between tuned profiles graphically, was as follows: > https://people.irisa.fr/Erwan.Bousse/2014/01/power-profiles-gui-using-yad-for-tuned-adm-and-cpupower/ > > > Recently I introduced a bug report related to the tuned-gtk desktop > launcher.https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356369 > >> >> >> -- >> desktop mailing list >> desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
