On Tue, 2016-01-26 at 01:31 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > OK. > > I can see blocking on Windows LUC, because how else do they make > media? If we really got down to blocking on OS X or Fedora LUC would > we really block, or just expect people to use litd or dd? Well, if we're talking about the glorious future where the new-age LUC is the one promoted tool, it'd have a strong claim to be a blocker. > And if any would block, does it make more sense to use Accepted0Day, > rather than actually hold up the release? That's not necessarily an either/or proposition. It would certainly be a non-media blocker, but that doesn't necessarily mean it wouldn't hold up the release. What exactly the process we follow for non-media blockers should *be* is something that's under discussion right now. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
