On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 11:59 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote: > > IIRC we aren't blocking on LUC currently -- so whether this means > reviving old criteria or creating new ones, that needs to be clear. Actually we are, though we have been known to handwave it a little: "Release-blocking live and dedicated installer images must boot when written to optical media of an appropriate size (if applicable) and when written to a USB stick with any of the officially supported methods." from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Beta_Release_Criteria ;, it's the first footnote to "Release-blocking images must boot", titled "Supported media types". So the official rule is that we block on all three 'officially supported methods' - dd-style write, litd, and luc. There's a bunch of wiggle room in terms of exactly how well we expect luc to work, and what exactly it means to 'block a release' on something that is not part of the release, but the criterion is there. > OTOH, the functions of LUC are pretty well constrained. So maybe this > isn't too large a change. What would actually be an *improvement* is if we killed litd and luc's 'cp mode', and only supported the new dd-only luc and dd-style writes. That would substantially reduce the exposure we currently have to three different writing modes: dd, litd, and luc-cp. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
