Re: Dropping i686 media for F24

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 11:28:25PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 11:59 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> > 
> > IIRC we aren't blocking on LUC currently -- so whether this means
> > reviving old criteria or creating new ones, that needs to be clear.
> 
> Actually we are, though we have been known to handwave it a little:

Thanks for the correction.

> "Release-blocking live and dedicated installer images must boot when
> written to optical media of an appropriate size (if applicable) and
> when written to a USB stick with any of the officially supported
> methods."
> 
> from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Beta_Release_Criteria ;,
> it's the first footnote to "Release-blocking images must boot", titled
> "Supported media types". So the official rule is that we block on all
> three 'officially supported methods' - dd-style write, litd, and luc.
> There's a bunch of wiggle room in terms of exactly how well we expect
> luc to work, and what exactly it means to 'block a release' on
> something that is not part of the release, but the criterion is there.

In a recent release (maybe a year ago?) I recall we discussed whether
we needed to pull out some stops to fix a LUC issue.  I think my
confusion about blocking may have come from that (sorry, it's hazy and
I've no time to play email archaeology at the moment). :-)

But as you mention below, I agree we should cut down on the different
vectors here, and do a better job of supporting one.

> > OTOH, the functions of LUC are pretty well constrained.  So maybe this
> > isn't too large a change. 
> 
> What would actually be an *improvement* is if we killed litd and luc's
> 'cp mode', and only supported the new dd-only luc and dd-style writes.
> That would substantially reduce the exposure we currently have to three
> different writing modes: dd, litd, and luc-cp.

Agreed -- I think I heard (maybe elsewhere in this thread?) that the
plan was to remove the cp option in LUC, but I'll check with mbriza.

-- 
Paul W. Frields                                http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
  http://redhat.com/   -  -  -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
    The open source story continues to grow: http://opensource.com
--
desktop mailing list
desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora KDE]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux