On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 13:20 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 9:59 AM, Paul W. Frields <stickster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > IIRC we aren't blocking on LUC currently -- so whether this means > > reviving old criteria or creating new ones, that needs to be clear. > > OTOH, the functions of LUC are pretty well constrained. So maybe this > > isn't too large a change. > > Well if LUC is blocking on Linux, Windows, and OS X, that's three rows > added to a matrix that has the same number of column as the total > number of release blocking media per arch. Well no it's not, because we already have one row for luc in the matrix. And we really haven't clearly defined in exactly what circumstances we expect luc to work; you can argue under the current criteria that we *already* require it to work on Fedora and Windows, since the wiki page on USB writing (which the criteria links to) lists it as a recommended tool for those platforms. If the current luc actually ran on OS X we'd probably list it for OS X too. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
