On Thu, 2016-01-14 at 14:10 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > > > Well, whenever I've seen it discussed, there's been an understanding > > that there's a difference there; we do ship a lot of non-release- > > blocking media, after all. The idea was that declaring that i686 media > > are not blocking is less drastic than out-and-out dropping them, and > > gives WGs / SIGs the power to choose whether they want to keep shipping > > the images or not. So I'd say you still have a choice to make here: do > > you want to keep producing non-blocking 32-bit Workstation media in a > > sort of 'here they are if you REALLY want them' way, or just stop > > producing them entirely? > > If they are made, is QA going to commit to testing them as they have > in the past even if none of the issues found are going to block the > release? If so, then we have a discussion to have. If not, then I > really don't see the point in shipping untested media. Well, we'd treat them just as any other non-release-blocking-but-still- kinda-significant media, I guess - like the Xfce images, for e.g. There'd be no need to drop the tests from the matrices, but they'd be done on a best-effort basis. We could still have openQA do the 32-bit testing it currently does (right now we only really test install of live media, but I may get around to adding a few of the 'desktop' tests to openQA before this cycle gets too busy). -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
