On 01/14/2016 11:03 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2016-01-14 at 05:27 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 5:00 AM, Kamil Paral <kparal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2015-August/001661.html
Stephen Gallagher has proposed a Change for Server to drop i686 media
for F24. Given our previous list discussion, this is something for
which we should probably follow suit. Thoughts?
--
Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/
I wonder if this discussion (archive here [1]) had any conclusion? I just noticed that the Server SIG's proposal is in the F24 ChangeSet [2], but it is not the case for Workstation. If you plan to drop i686 medium, there are 12 more days until the proposal submission deadline [3].
FESCo voted that no i686 media will block the release from F24 and
forward, so it doesn't make much sense to generate it.
Well, whenever I've seen it discussed, there's been an understanding
that there's a difference there; we do ship a lot of non-release-
blocking media, after all. The idea was that declaring that i686 media
are not blocking is less drastic than out-and-out dropping them, and
gives WGs / SIGs the power to choose whether they want to keep shipping
the images or not. So I'd say you still have a choice to make here: do
you want to keep producing non-blocking 32-bit Workstation media in a
sort of 'here they are if you REALLY want them' way, or just stop
producing them entirely?
I don't think they'll stop being produced/shipped unless you
specifically ask releng to stop producing them, and it might be nice to
have that tracked as a Change or similar indeed.
soas uses i686 media ...
Tom Gilliard
satellit
--
desktop mailing list
desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
