On Thu, 2016-01-14 at 05:27 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 5:00 AM, Kamil Paral <kparal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2015-August/001661.html > > > > > > Stephen Gallagher has proposed a Change for Server to drop i686 media > > > for F24. Given our previous list discussion, this is something for > > > which we should probably follow suit. Thoughts? > > > > > > -- > > > Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ > > > > I wonder if this discussion (archive here [1]) had any conclusion? I just noticed that the Server SIG's proposal is in the F24 ChangeSet [2], but it is not the case for Workstation. If you plan to drop i686 medium, there are 12 more days until the proposal submission deadline [3]. > > FESCo voted that no i686 media will block the release from F24 and > forward, so it doesn't make much sense to generate it. Well, whenever I've seen it discussed, there's been an understanding that there's a difference there; we do ship a lot of non-release- blocking media, after all. The idea was that declaring that i686 media are not blocking is less drastic than out-and-out dropping them, and gives WGs / SIGs the power to choose whether they want to keep shipping the images or not. So I'd say you still have a choice to make here: do you want to keep producing non-blocking 32-bit Workstation media in a sort of 'here they are if you REALLY want them' way, or just stop producing them entirely? I don't think they'll stop being produced/shipped unless you specifically ask releng to stop producing them, and it might be nice to have that tracked as a Change or similar indeed. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
