On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 2:07 PM, kendell clark <coffeekingms@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On 1/11/2016 1:01 PM, Elad Alfassa wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 8:21 PM, Nikos Roussos <comzeradd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: >> >> >> >> >A few reasons, in my own personally believed order of popularity for >> >Chrome: >> > >> >1. Media "just works". Netflix, amazon video/music, spotify, etc. >> >> Netflix "just works" on Firefox too (due to EME support). Spotify is >> flash. If you install flash-plugin it works on Firefox too. > > > Installing Flash does not count as "just works"... and Firefox does not > support EME on Linux, and it won't support it for a while. I tried it this > week with both the release version, and nightly, and neither had EME > working. > > -- > -Elad. > > > "I'll look at this from a different point of view. What good is chrome, no > matter how wonderful and fast and easy it is, if an entire segment of the > population cannot use it? Where's the justification for not even bothering > to make it usable except through their own addons? I for one have not bought > into the wonderfullness of drm, or the "just works" philosophy. Some of my > community has, but I have not. No matter how good a piece of software is, if > I can't use it, it might as well be a black screen. My two scents, I'll shut > up now, I've beaten this dead horse enough lol. You're asking fine questions, but nobody here is advocating for Chrome nor can we answer those questions even if we were. They should be asked of Google upstream. josh -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
