>A few reasons, in my own personally believed order of popularity for >Chrome: > >1. Media "just works". Netflix, amazon video/music, spotify, etc. Netflix "just works" on Firefox too (due to EME support). Spotify is flash. If you install flash-plugin it works on Firefox too. >2. Per process tabs mean one tab crashing doesn't take down the whole >browser That's already the case with Firefox too. It's just not yet enabled by default on the stable version. https://wiki.mozilla.org/Electrolysis >3. Tight integration into the Google ecosystem. That's true. But that's an anti-feature. I don't think it's a nice user experience to distribute them a browser that tries to force them to create a Google account (that's Chrome's default first tab). >4. For a while, it was much faster than Firefox for typical javascript >heavy sites, etc. I believe Firefox has caught up for the most part. That's old news. At the moment even Edge is probably faster than Chrome. -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx