On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 03:16:08PM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: > On 10 September 2015 at 15:09, Paul W. Frields <stickster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > * The user selects installation, and receives a notice that the > > application is not part of official Fedora repositories. > > Isn't this a workaround for the FPC decision? It kinda means thousands > of users are going to have problems upgrading to F23, and have to > click a little button to enable a 3rd party copr (which can do pretty > much anything to your system...) which will mean very little to most > people. It is, and this why I disagree with the rest of FESCo on this. > Can't someone just tell the FPC they got it wrong in this case? FPC is > not a useful thing if we're promoting workarounds for our default > product. FESCo could have overruled the FPC, but they chose not to [1]. Cheers, Debarshi [1] Since I was the only one in FESCo opposing this decision, I chose to use "they" to refer to the committee, instead of "we".
Attachment:
pgp0F_0WfrT2P.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
