On Thu, 2015-09-10 at 15:16 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: > On 10 September 2015 at 15:09, Paul W. Frields <stickster@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > * The user selects installation, and receives a notice that the > > application is not part of official Fedora repositories. > > Isn't this a workaround for the FPC decision? It kinda means > thousands > of users are going to have problems upgrading to F23, and have to > click a little button to enable a 3rd party copr (which can do pretty > much anything to your system...) which will mean very little to most > people. > > Can't someone just tell the FPC they got it wrong in this case? FPC > is > not a useful thing if we're promoting workarounds for our default > product. > FESCo didn't want to overrule FPC on this (in part because none of us had followed it too closely). That said, I'm raising a discussion to change the policy rather than work around it. See the devel@ list and feel free to voice support or disagreement.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
