On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 12:06 PM, Debarshi Ray <rishi.is@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 03:16:08PM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: >> On 10 September 2015 at 15:09, Paul W. Frields <stickster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > * The user selects installation, and receives a notice that the >> > application is not part of official Fedora repositories. >> >> Isn't this a workaround for the FPC decision? It kinda means thousands >> of users are going to have problems upgrading to F23, and have to >> click a little button to enable a 3rd party copr (which can do pretty >> much anything to your system...) which will mean very little to most >> people. > > It is, and this why I disagree with the rest of FESCo on this. > >> Can't someone just tell the FPC they got it wrong in this case? FPC is >> not a useful thing if we're promoting workarounds for our default >> product. > > FESCo could have overruled the FPC, but they chose not to [1]. > > Cheers, > Debarshi > > [1] Since I was the only one in FESCo opposing this decision, I chose to > use "they" to refer to the committee, instead of "we". This is accurate and perfectly acceptable. In light of some further discussion today, I'd probably change my vote to support an override but it still would not come to quorum. josh -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
