Re: Underlying DE for the Workstation product, Desktop -vs- Workstation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 9:48 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
<johannbg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 02/03/2014 08:49 PM, drago01 wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 9:45 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
>> <johannbg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 02/03/2014 08:43 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>>
>>> I think there are important and useful discussions to be had about how
>>> we handle desktops that are *not*
>>>   the one the Workstation product is
>>> based around.
>>>
>>>
>>> I dont see any need for discussion how we handle the workstation WG or
>>> any
>>> other branded product for that matter they will have to provide resources
>>> to
>>> maintainability QA and release those products themselves as others
>>> products
>>> already have had to do.
>>
>> And you decided this on your own?
>
>
> The WG's dont dictate or decide how we in QA spend our time.

Where did I say that? Where did QA decide that they now longer want to
test desktops?
You seem to always talk about the whole QA community while in fact you
are talking about yourself.
-- 
desktop mailing list
desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora KDE]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux