On Mon, 2013-12-09 at 17:20 +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote: > Am Mittwoch, den 27.11.2013, 09:42 -0500 schrieb Matthias Clasen: > > > > It will have a default user experience that is using one desktop > > environment, GNOME. We will define criteria for other desktop > > environments to be installable as alternatives. Those criteria will > > include things such as: > > > > - use logind for session registration > > - work with gdm as the display manager > > - does not interfere with the default user experience (cf the recent > > incident where installing cinnamon broke screen locking in GNOME) > > Why do you use the term "default user experience" when you in fact are > talking about gnome and gdm? Correct me if I'm wrong, but the working > group has not made a decision yet. > > I think that GNOME is the DE suited best to become the default, but I > cannot support your other criteria. If other desktops are not supposed > to not interfere with GNOME, can we expect GNOME to not interfere with > other desktops? I would expect that clear rules about expected integration points would help avoiding interference both ways. Do you have any concrete example in mind where GNOME trampled other desktops ? -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
