Re: Updated Fedora Workstation PRD draft

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]




On 11/26/2013 04:26 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Tue, 2013-11-26 at 15:00 +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
On 11/26/2013 01:47 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
I think you're conflating the PRD with a marketing document.
When using PRD's you are supposed to first create CRD
Charles River Development ?
Council for Resource Development ?
Computational Research Division ?

nope, nope, nope.

Comping up empty here...


Sorry slip on the keyboard..

MRD + PRD go hand in hand.

The market requirements document ( MRD ) describe the opportunity or the market need like why the user should chose Fedora Workstation over anything that the other distribution have to offer or are out there on the market, what advantages it will bring him etc.

The product requirements document ( PRD ) describe a product that addresses that opportunity essentially how the output from the workstation WG will proved that added functionality.

So the first step in the process is to complete the MRD the second step is to complete the PRD and I'm not aware of anyone in the marketing community writing MRD for any of the WG's ( or the WG's themselves coming up with one ) and these goes hand in hand.

For this process to effectively work as advertised both steps need to be complete not just the half of it.

In addition to that applying something like PRD's on open community is rather a bold move since it's purpose is very specific.


JBG
--
desktop mailing list
desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora KDE]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux