On 03/25/2013 11:53 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > The components have to stay the number of maintainers need to be > increased behind relevant component(s) and or those maintainers that are > unwilling or otherwise unable to due their due diligence in their > distribution maintainership for one reason or another be replaced with > once that are. I believe they *are* doing their due diligence, it's just that they're upstream. I've fallen into the trap of reporting certain things downstream (even outside of GNOME) and finding out later that it's better to report upstream for certain components. We can't expect our users to know which components in Fedora's bugzilla are *real* and which you're better off not bothering with. Maybe if we can auto-detect a maintainer in our downstream is the same as a maintainer upstream, we pre-fill the bug template for their component with 'don't use this, file at bugzilla.upstream.org'? And then if the downstream maintainer ever changes, reactivating the component? ~m -- desktop mailing list desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
