Re: [PATCH] drm/fourcc: introduce DRM_FOURCC_STANDALONE guard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday, February 3rd, 2021 at 3:13 PM, Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> As said before, there are multiple ways to handle this without
> introducing yet another UAPI header. I don't see why you're dismissing
> all of them, can you elaborate?

Because I hate it when I have to adjust my compiler flags because of
some third-party header.

Can you explain what were the past issues with introducing a new
header?
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux