Re: [PATCH] drm/fourcc: introduce DRM_FOURCC_STANDALONE guard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 at 09:27, Simon Ser <contact@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, February 3rd, 2021 at 1:56 AM, Emil Velikov emil.l.velikov@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> > As summed in the commit message the burden is only applicable when all
> > of the following are set:
> >  - non-linux
> >  - force DRM_FOURCC_STANDALONE
> >  - c99 -pedantic
>
> Oh, and FWIW, this is not a theoretical situation at all. All of these
> conditions happen to be true on my compositor. It has FreeBSD CI,
> -Werror, and will use DRM_FOURCC_STANDALONE when available.

There are ways to disable [1] or silence [2] this - are you
intentionally ignoring them?
Or the goal here is to 'fix' the kernel for a very uncommon non-linux use-case?

-Emil

[1] pragma GCC diagnostic warning "-Wpedantic"
[2] pragma GCC diagnostic ignored or -std=c11
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux