On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 at 13:47, Simon Ser <contact@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wednesday, February 3rd, 2021 at 12:03 PM, Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > No issue then, great. Let's merge this trivial solution and move on to > > other things. > > Just because one compositor isn't affected isn't an excuse for the > kernel to force its users to use a specific C standard. As said before, there are multiple ways to handle this _without_ introducing yet another UAPI header. I don't see why you're dismissing all of them, can you elaborate? Thanks Emil _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
