Moji <lordmoji@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Plausible deniability has legal ramifications that are beneficial in > those more litigious societies, to which many people belong. In which ones? > This shifts the burden of proof to the opposing attorney/agency to prove > that random data represents information that you are obscuring. In which country is it possible for you to get convicted for something they assume but cannot proof because you don't give them the key to prove it on the one hand while it is not possible for them to force you to give them more on the other hand? regards Mario -- I've never been certain whether the moral of the Icarus story should only be, as is generally accepted, "Don't try to fly too high," or whether it might also be thought of as, "Forget the wax and feathers and do a better job on the wings." -- Stanley Kubrick _______________________________________________ dm-crypt mailing list dm-crypt@xxxxxxxx http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt
