Re: cryptsetup, LUKS, plausible deniability

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Arno Wagner <arno@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 09:04:24PM +0100, Sarah Dean wrote:
>> There's no incentive to hand over your keys, since it won't achieve (or
>> stop) anything.
> True. But how does plausible deniability factor into
> your comment? If you are that hard, you can just use
> ordinary encryption and refuse to give the keys.

That's wrong. With plausible deniability you (or your companions) don't
need to be so hard as you need to be without. Since with p.d. you can be
*sure* your torture will not stop just because you give them one more
key (because you cannot proof it was the last, it wouldn't be plausible
deniable then), giving them more doesn't give you a benefit. Without
p.d. it gives you a benefit to tell them more. Thus, without p.d. you
need to be harder not to tell your secrets: torture would be over then.


regards
   Mario
-- 
Ho ho ho! I am Santa Claus of Borg. Nice assimilation all together!

_______________________________________________
dm-crypt mailing list
dm-crypt@xxxxxxxx
http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt

[Index of Archives]     [Device Mapper Devel]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux