On 28/12/2022 04:23, yanhong wang wrote: > > > On 2022/12/27 17:52, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 27/12/2022 10:38, yanhong wang wrote: >>>> >>>> This must be false. After referencing ethernet-phy this should be >>>> unevaluatedProperties: false. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> Thanks. Parts of this patch exist already, after discussion unanimity was achieved, >>> i will remove the parts of YT8531 in the next version. >> >> I don't understand what does it mean. You sent duplicated patch? If so, >> please do not... you waste reviewers time. >> >> Anyway this entire patch does not meet criteria for submission at all, >> so please start over from example-schema. >> > > Sorry, maybe I didn't make it clear, which led to misunderstanding. Motorcomm Inc is also > carrying out the upstream of YT8531, and my patch will be duplicated and conflicted > with their submission. By communicating with the developers of Motorcomm Inc, the part > of YT8531 will be submitted by Motorcomm Inc, so my submission about YT8531 will be withdrawn. Are they going to apply the feedback received for this series? Best regards, Krzysztof
