On 2022/12/28 17:11, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 28/12/2022 04:23, yanhong wang wrote: >> >> >> On 2022/12/27 17:52, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>> On 27/12/2022 10:38, yanhong wang wrote: >>>>> >>>>> This must be false. After referencing ethernet-phy this should be >>>>> unevaluatedProperties: false. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks. Parts of this patch exist already, after discussion unanimity was achieved, >>>> i will remove the parts of YT8531 in the next version. >>> >>> I don't understand what does it mean. You sent duplicated patch? If so, >>> please do not... you waste reviewers time. >>> >>> Anyway this entire patch does not meet criteria for submission at all, >>> so please start over from example-schema. >>> >> >> Sorry, maybe I didn't make it clear, which led to misunderstanding. Motorcomm Inc is also >> carrying out the upstream of YT8531, and my patch will be duplicated and conflicted >> with their submission. By communicating with the developers of Motorcomm Inc, the part >> of YT8531 will be submitted by Motorcomm Inc, so my submission about YT8531 will be withdrawn. > > Are they going to apply the feedback received for this series? > Yes, they support not only YT8531, but also other models of their company. > Best regards, > Krzysztof >
