On 2022/12/27 17:52, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 27/12/2022 10:38, yanhong wang wrote: >>> >>> This must be false. After referencing ethernet-phy this should be >>> unevaluatedProperties: false. >>> >>> >> >> Thanks. Parts of this patch exist already, after discussion unanimity was achieved, >> i will remove the parts of YT8531 in the next version. > > I don't understand what does it mean. You sent duplicated patch? If so, > please do not... you waste reviewers time. > > Anyway this entire patch does not meet criteria for submission at all, > so please start over from example-schema. > Sorry, maybe I didn't make it clear, which led to misunderstanding. Motorcomm Inc is also carrying out the upstream of YT8531, and my patch will be duplicated and conflicted with their submission. By communicating with the developers of Motorcomm Inc, the part of YT8531 will be submitted by Motorcomm Inc, so my submission about YT8531 will be withdrawn. > Best regards, > Krzysztof >
