On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 12:14:43PM +0900, Gyungoh Yoo wrote:
> So, what do you think about DT like below?
> sky81452@2c {
> compatible = "skyworks,sky81452";
> reg = <0x2c>;
>
> backlight {
> compatible = "skyworks,sky81452-backlight";
> name = "pwm-backlight";
> enable = <0x3F>;
> ignore-pwm;
> };
>
> regulator {
> compatible = "skyworks,sky81452-regulator";
Yes, this is good but I still feel that the above compatible is
redundant and shouildn't be there.
> lout@0 {
> regulator-name = "LOUT";
> regulator-min-microvolt = <4500000>;
> regulator-max-microvolt = <8000000>;
> };
> };
> };
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
