On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 10:11:12AM +0900, Gyungoh Yoo wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 12:35:12PM +0200, Mark Brown wrote:
> > If you're doing anything here you should convert the code to use the
> > simplified interface for parsing regulator data based on putting the
> > subnode name and regualtor name in the regulator descriptor.
> Thank you for the review.
> The driver has of_device_id.
> static const struct of_device_id sky81452_reg_of_match[] = {
> { .compatible = "skyworks,sky81452-regulator", },
> { }
> };
> And the MFD adds the driver with of_compatible="skyworks,sky81452-regulator".
> MFD core maps the device node and the regulator driver does
> not need to parse the subnode name.
No, that's for the device (and as I say I don't think this is a good
idea). I'm talking about the parsing of the constraints from the DT.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
