On 31/08/2022 06:17, Zong Li wrote: > [Some people who received this message don't often get email from zongbox@xxxxxxxxx. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] > > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe > > <Conor.Dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 於 2022年8月31日 週三 凌晨1:09寫道： >> That would keep the enforcement for existing caches and allow you >> the freedome to do w/e you want for the ccache0 compatible. > > Thanks you all for bring me here, we actually have some core series > with 4096 cache set in ccache, should we need to extend the cache set > as follow? or we only need to focus on the DTS which is already in > mainline. > > cache-sets: > - enum: [1024, 2048] > + enum: [1024, 2048, 4096] Until a user shows up, I think we are better off not adding 4096. >>> Do we need someone to take charge of this series? >>> >> >> Can I volunteer Zong? (since all but two of the patches are theirs) >> > > It is ok to me, but I'm still refining the patchset for V2, and I'm > not sure if we will need the V3. Do you prefer to take V2 patch set > first and replace the dt-binding patch? If you could incorporate it for v2 it would make reviewing easier I think. Thanks, Conor.
