Hi Marc, On 15/06/20 2:04 pm, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On 2020-06-15 09:03, Lokesh Vutla wrote: >> Hi Marc, >> >> On 01/06/20 5:06 pm, Lokesh Vutla wrote: >>> Hi Marc, >>> >>> On 29/05/20 3:48 pm, Marc Zyngier wrote: >>>> On 2020-05-29 11:14, Lokesh Vutla wrote: >>>>> Hi Rob, >>>>> >>>>> On 29/05/20 3:44 am, Rob Herring wrote: >>>>>> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 06:14:46PM +0530, Lokesh Vutla wrote: >>>>>>> Drop the firmware related dt-bindings and use the hardware specified >>>>>>> interrupt numbers within Interrupt Router. This ensures interrupt router >>>>>>> DT node need not assume any interrupt parent type. >>>>>> >>>>>> I didn't like this binding to begin with, but now you're breaking >>>>>> compatibility. >>>>> >>>>> Yes, I do agree that this change is breaking backward compatibility. But IMHO, >>>>> this does cleanup of firmware specific properties from DT. Since this is not >>>>> deployed out yet in the wild market, I took the leverage of breaking backward >>>>> compatibility. Before accepting these changes from firmware team, I did >>>>> discuss[0] with Marc on this topic. >>>> >>>> And I assume that should anyone complain about the kernel being broken >>>> because they have an old firmware, you'll be OK with the patches being >>>> reverted, right? >>> >>> I am assuming there is no one to complain as there is no product available yet >>> with upstream kernel. Internally everyone is aware of the changes. So, yes I >>> would agree with you to revert the changes if someone really needs it. :) >> >> Any chance you can shower your blessings on this series :) > > I have purposely ignored it just before and during the merge window. It is now > firmly in my review queue. rc4 is tagged now. Do you want me to rebase, split the series and repost it? Thanks and reagrds, Lokesh > > M.
