On 2020-06-15 09:03, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
Hi Marc,
On 01/06/20 5:06 pm, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
Hi Marc,
On 29/05/20 3:48 pm, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On 2020-05-29 11:14, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
Hi Rob,
On 29/05/20 3:44 am, Rob Herring wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 06:14:46PM +0530, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
Drop the firmware related dt-bindings and use the hardware
specified
interrupt numbers within Interrupt Router. This ensures interrupt
router
DT node need not assume any interrupt parent type.
I didn't like this binding to begin with, but now you're breaking
compatibility.
Yes, I do agree that this change is breaking backward compatibility.
But IMHO,
this does cleanup of firmware specific properties from DT. Since
this is not
deployed out yet in the wild market, I took the leverage of breaking
backward
compatibility. Before accepting these changes from firmware team, I
did
discuss[0] with Marc on this topic.
And I assume that should anyone complain about the kernel being
broken
because they have an old firmware, you'll be OK with the patches
being
reverted, right?
I am assuming there is no one to complain as there is no product
available yet
with upstream kernel. Internally everyone is aware of the changes. So,
yes I
would agree with you to revert the changes if someone really needs it.
:)
Any chance you can shower your blessings on this series :)
I have purposely ignored it just before and during the merge window. It
is now firmly in my review queue.
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
