Hi Marc, On 01/06/20 5:06 pm, Lokesh Vutla wrote: > Hi Marc, > > On 29/05/20 3:48 pm, Marc Zyngier wrote: >> On 2020-05-29 11:14, Lokesh Vutla wrote: >>> Hi Rob, >>> >>> On 29/05/20 3:44 am, Rob Herring wrote: >>>> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 06:14:46PM +0530, Lokesh Vutla wrote: >>>>> Drop the firmware related dt-bindings and use the hardware specified >>>>> interrupt numbers within Interrupt Router. This ensures interrupt router >>>>> DT node need not assume any interrupt parent type. >>>> >>>> I didn't like this binding to begin with, but now you're breaking >>>> compatibility. >>> >>> Yes, I do agree that this change is breaking backward compatibility. But IMHO, >>> this does cleanup of firmware specific properties from DT. Since this is not >>> deployed out yet in the wild market, I took the leverage of breaking backward >>> compatibility. Before accepting these changes from firmware team, I did >>> discuss[0] with Marc on this topic. >> >> And I assume that should anyone complain about the kernel being broken >> because they have an old firmware, you'll be OK with the patches being >> reverted, right? > > I am assuming there is no one to complain as there is no product available yet > with upstream kernel. Internally everyone is aware of the changes. So, yes I > would agree with you to revert the changes if someone really needs it. :) Any chance you can shower your blessings on this series :) Thanks and regards, Lokesh > > Thanks and regards, > Lokesh > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel >
