Hi Marc, On 29/05/20 3:48 pm, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On 2020-05-29 11:14, Lokesh Vutla wrote: >> Hi Rob, >> >> On 29/05/20 3:44 am, Rob Herring wrote: >>> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 06:14:46PM +0530, Lokesh Vutla wrote: >>>> Drop the firmware related dt-bindings and use the hardware specified >>>> interrupt numbers within Interrupt Router. This ensures interrupt router >>>> DT node need not assume any interrupt parent type. >>> >>> I didn't like this binding to begin with, but now you're breaking >>> compatibility. >> >> Yes, I do agree that this change is breaking backward compatibility. But IMHO, >> this does cleanup of firmware specific properties from DT. Since this is not >> deployed out yet in the wild market, I took the leverage of breaking backward >> compatibility. Before accepting these changes from firmware team, I did >> discuss[0] with Marc on this topic. > > And I assume that should anyone complain about the kernel being broken > because they have an old firmware, you'll be OK with the patches being > reverted, right? I am assuming there is no one to complain as there is no product available yet with upstream kernel. Internally everyone is aware of the changes. So, yes I would agree with you to revert the changes if someone really needs it. :) Thanks and regards, Lokesh
