On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 06:05:23PM +0000, Ken Sloat wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Eugen.Hristev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <Eugen.Hristev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Sent: Friday, January 18, 2019 9:40 AM > > To: Ken Sloat <KSloat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx; Nicolas.Ferre@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; > > alexandre.belloni@xxxxxxxxxxx; Ludovic.Desroches@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux- > > media@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] media: atmel-isc: Update device tree binding > > documentation > > > > > > > > On 18.01.2019 16:28, Ken Sloat wrote: > > > From: Ken Sloat <ksloat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Update device tree binding documentation specifying how to enable > > > BT656 with CRC decoding. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ken Sloat <ksloat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > Changes in v2: > > > -Use correct media "bus-type" dt property. > > > > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/atmel-isc.txt | 5 +++++ > > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/atmel-isc.txt > > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/atmel-isc.txt > > > index bbe0e87c6188..2d4378dfd6c8 100644 > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/atmel-isc.txt > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/atmel-isc.txt > > > @@ -21,6 +21,11 @@ Required properties for ISC: > > > - pinctrl-names, pinctrl-0 > > > Please refer to pinctrl-bindings.txt. > > > > > > +Optional properties for ISC: > > > +- bus-type > > > + When set to 6, Bt.656 decoding (embedded sync) with CRC decoding > > > + is enabled. > > > + > > > > I don't think this patch is required at all actually, the binding complies to the > > video-interfaces bus specification which includes the parallel and bt.656. > > > > Would be worth mentioning below explicitly that parallel and bt.656 are > > supported, or added above that also plain parallel bus is supported ? > > > > > ISC supports a single port node with parallel bus. It should contain > > > one > > > > here inside the previous line > Hi Eugen, > > Yes it's true adding new documentation here may be overkill, but yes it should say something > (as a user I always find it helpful if the docs are more verbose than not). > > So per your suggestion, how about the simplified: > "ISC supports a single port node with parallel bus and optionally Bt.656 support." > > and I'll remit the other statements. Please still include the name of the property, as well as the valid values for it (numeric as well as human-readable). The rest of the documentation should stay in video-interfaces.txt IMO --- this is documentation for the hardware only. -- Regards, Sakari Ailus
