> > > That shows the dividers as being somewhere in between the PLL and the
> MUX.
> > > The MUX is where the divider is selected. There's nothing in the
> > > PLL's programming interface that relates to the dividers. As such
> > > it's simpler to model it as being part of the MUX.
> > >
> > > -Scott
> > >
> > I don't know whether it is simpler, but "modeling divider as being part
> of the MUX"
> > is your guess, right?
> > If the "divider" is included in MUX, the MUX would not be called "MUX".
>
> It's still selecting from multiple PLLs.
>
> > I don't know whether "divider" module exists or not. If it exists, it
> > should be part of PLL or between PLL and MUX. wherever it was, the
> device tree binding is appropriate.
>
> The device tree binding is unnecessarily complicated.
>
> > The P3041RM shows exactly each PLL has 2 outputs which definitely have
> no "divider" at all.
>
> That diagram is a bit weird -- one of the outputs is used as is, and the
> other is split into 1/2 and 1/4. It doesn't really matter though; the
> end result is the same. We're describing the programming interface, not
> artwork choices in the manual.
>
> -Scott
>
If the device tree needs to be modified, could you give me your suggestions?
Regards,
Yuantian
��.n��������+%������w��{.n����z�{��ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
