On Friday 11 October 2013 01:53 PM, Chanwoo Choi wrote: > On 10/11/2013 04:52 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: >> Hi Chanwoo, >> >> On Friday 11 October 2013 12:36 PM, Chanwoo Choi wrote: >>> On 10/11/2013 03:15 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: >>>> On Thursday 10 October 2013 06:41 PM, Laxman Dewangan wrote: >>>>> On Thursday 10 October 2013 06:07 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: >>>>>> The Palmas device contains only a USB VBUS-ID detector, so added a >>>>>> compatible type *ti,palmas-usb-vid*. Didn't remove the existing compatible >>>>>> types for backward compatibility. >>>>>> >>>>> I dont have much issue on this nomenclature but just second thought: >>>>> >>>>> The Palmas USB module is capable of detection VBUS, ID-GND, ID-RA, ID-RB, ID-RC >>>>> and ID-FLOAT as per BC1.2. >>>>> This sub-module only detect the cable, does nothing more than this. >>>>> In this case, should we say "ti,palmas-usb-extcon"? >>>>> Again extcon is linux specific terminology and this can be defer. >>>> >>>> I don't mind either way. Chanwoo? >>> >>> The EXTCON is subsystem name. I don't prefer to use 'extcon' word on device name. >>> I agree Kishon opinion. >> >> Cool.. can you this patch as-is? >> > > OK, applied it. Thanks :-) -Kishon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
