On 10/11/2013 04:52 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: > Hi Chanwoo, > > On Friday 11 October 2013 12:36 PM, Chanwoo Choi wrote: >> On 10/11/2013 03:15 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: >>> On Thursday 10 October 2013 06:41 PM, Laxman Dewangan wrote: >>>> On Thursday 10 October 2013 06:07 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: >>>>> The Palmas device contains only a USB VBUS-ID detector, so added a >>>>> compatible type *ti,palmas-usb-vid*. Didn't remove the existing compatible >>>>> types for backward compatibility. >>>>> >>>> I dont have much issue on this nomenclature but just second thought: >>>> >>>> The Palmas USB module is capable of detection VBUS, ID-GND, ID-RA, ID-RB, ID-RC >>>> and ID-FLOAT as per BC1.2. >>>> This sub-module only detect the cable, does nothing more than this. >>>> In this case, should we say "ti,palmas-usb-extcon"? >>>> Again extcon is linux specific terminology and this can be defer. >>> >>> I don't mind either way. Chanwoo? >> >> The EXTCON is subsystem name. I don't prefer to use 'extcon' word on device name. >> I agree Kishon opinion. > > Cool.. can you this patch as-is? > OK, applied it. Thanks, Chanwoo Choi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
