Hi Chanwoo, On Friday 11 October 2013 12:36 PM, Chanwoo Choi wrote: > On 10/11/2013 03:15 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: >> On Thursday 10 October 2013 06:41 PM, Laxman Dewangan wrote: >>> On Thursday 10 October 2013 06:07 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: >>>> The Palmas device contains only a USB VBUS-ID detector, so added a >>>> compatible type *ti,palmas-usb-vid*. Didn't remove the existing compatible >>>> types for backward compatibility. >>>> >>> I dont have much issue on this nomenclature but just second thought: >>> >>> The Palmas USB module is capable of detection VBUS, ID-GND, ID-RA, ID-RB, ID-RC >>> and ID-FLOAT as per BC1.2. >>> This sub-module only detect the cable, does nothing more than this. >>> In this case, should we say "ti,palmas-usb-extcon"? >>> Again extcon is linux specific terminology and this can be defer. >> >> I don't mind either way. Chanwoo? > > The EXTCON is subsystem name. I don't prefer to use 'extcon' word on device name. > I agree Kishon opinion. Cool.. can you this patch as-is? Thanks Kishon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
