On 10/11/2013 03:15 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: > On Thursday 10 October 2013 06:41 PM, Laxman Dewangan wrote: >> On Thursday 10 October 2013 06:07 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: >>> The Palmas device contains only a USB VBUS-ID detector, so added a >>> compatible type *ti,palmas-usb-vid*. Didn't remove the existing compatible >>> types for backward compatibility. >>> >> I dont have much issue on this nomenclature but just second thought: >> >> The Palmas USB module is capable of detection VBUS, ID-GND, ID-RA, ID-RB, ID-RC >> and ID-FLOAT as per BC1.2. >> This sub-module only detect the cable, does nothing more than this. >> In this case, should we say "ti,palmas-usb-extcon"? >> Again extcon is linux specific terminology and this can be defer. > > I don't mind either way. Chanwoo? The EXTCON is subsystem name. I don't prefer to use 'extcon' word on device name. I agree Kishon opinion. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
