On Thursday 10 October 2013 06:41 PM, Laxman Dewangan wrote: > On Thursday 10 October 2013 06:07 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: >> The Palmas device contains only a USB VBUS-ID detector, so added a >> compatible type *ti,palmas-usb-vid*. Didn't remove the existing compatible >> types for backward compatibility. >> > I dont have much issue on this nomenclature but just second thought: > > The Palmas USB module is capable of detection VBUS, ID-GND, ID-RA, ID-RB, ID-RC > and ID-FLOAT as per BC1.2. > This sub-module only detect the cable, does nothing more than this. > In this case, should we say "ti,palmas-usb-extcon"? > Again extcon is linux specific terminology and this can be defer. I don't mind either way. Chanwoo? -Kishon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
