Thanks for pushing the branch on my behalf, it built OK[0] and I made some changes. Would you be so kind as to force-push the newer version[1]? [0] https://shaman.ceph.com/builds/ceph/wip-mempool-cacheline-49781/d9cb0ceae50de288ddee71c5bc84a7b2c5289211/ [1] https://lab.fedeproxy.eu/ceph/ceph/-/blob/wip-mempool-cacheline-49781/ On 02/04/2021 18:43, Loïc Dachary wrote: > Hi Nathan, > > I drafted a c2c standalone teuthology test[0]. Would you be so kind as to push it to GitHub on my behalf so that it builds the corresponding packages? I'm sorry to bother you with this but I don't know if there is another way to build the packages and tell teuthology to get them. > > Cheers > > [0] https://lab.fedeproxy.eu/ceph/ceph/-/tree/wip-mempool-cacheline-49781 > > On 25/03/2021 14:04, Loïc Dachary wrote: >> Hi Joe, >> >> Thanks for the comment, it makes perfect sense. I'm eager to work on it but I'll have be patient and wait until next week. >> >> To be continued! >> >> On 25/03/2021 13:40, jmario@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: >>> Hi Loïc: >>> One quick comment. >>> >>> Normally a script with many commands isn't needed to detect cacheline contention. The reason I gave you one is because I know nothing about your environment, the topology, the system, or the load you're running. The many commands in that script should give me enough information such that I don't come back a 2nd time asking you to rerun something because I needed more information. >>> >>> All it takes is one simple "perf c2c record ..." command to examine cacheline contention. And my goal is to help you see it yourself. >>> >>> Let me know when you have something. >>> Thank you. >>> Joe >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Dev mailing list -- dev@xxxxxxx >>> To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@xxxxxxx -- Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list -- dev@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@xxxxxxx
