Hi Joe, Thanks for the comment, it makes perfect sense. I'm eager to work on it but I'll have be patient and wait until next week. To be continued! On 25/03/2021 13:40, jmario@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Hi Loïc: > One quick comment. > > Normally a script with many commands isn't needed to detect cacheline contention. The reason I gave you one is because I know nothing about your environment, the topology, the system, or the load you're running. The many commands in that script should give me enough information such that I don't come back a 2nd time asking you to rerun something because I needed more information. > > All it takes is one simple "perf c2c record ..." command to examine cacheline contention. And my goal is to help you see it yourself. > > Let me know when you have something. > Thank you. > Joe > _______________________________________________ > Dev mailing list -- dev@xxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@xxxxxxx -- Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list -- dev@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to dev-leave@xxxxxxx
