Re: Dutch Government wants to regulate strong cryptography

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 10:54:13AM -0400, Michael H. Warfield wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 03:44:47PM +0200, Robert van der Meulen wrote:
> 	Yeah, I've seen some comments and a patch or two on the OpenSSH
> mailing list and some chatter on the SSH mailing list.  I think you could
> find a patch, which includes some time randomizers and some idle time
> packets, just by searching archives on the mailings lists for the last
> couple of months.

I'd be interested in any such patches you might be able to dig up or know of.  An idle random-packet generator would be quite interesting, especially if it meant that the two sides sometimes acknowledged (echo'd) the packets and other times didn't, to simulate interactive and non-interactive packets.  It would have to send the packets sometimes individually like random key strokes, and other times in chunks like an X application.

If anyone here knows of any cryptographers that have actually looked at these types of traffic analysis attacks and preventative measures, feel free to post links.
-- 
Michael T. Babcock
CTO, FibreSpeed Ltd.

Linux-crypto:  cryptography in and on the Linux system
Archive:       http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-crypto/


[Index of Archives]     [Kernel]     [Linux Crypto]     [Gnu Crypto]     [Gnu Classpath]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]
  Powered by Linux