does Corosync support to manage/monitor service without Pacemaker?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi, 

as you know, we can config pacemaker service in corosync.conf, and use Pacemaker for resource management, monitoring. 

service {
        # Load the Pacemaker Cluster Resource Manager
        name: pacemaker
        ver:  1
}

my question is could Corosync support to manage/monitor resources without Pacemaker? and what's is the "service" definition format? 

for example Heartbeat v3 has the simple functionality to manage resources without Pacemaker (no resource monitoring). The reason I ask this question is because we have not much resources to manage and monitor, i think we can eliminate the system complexity if we do not introduce Pacemaker as resource management. 

thanks, 
Emre

_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.corosync.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Clusters]     [Corosync Project]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Photo]     [Yosemite News]    [Yosemite Photos]    [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [X.Org]

  Powered by Linux