http://blog.clusterlabs.org/blog/2009/configuring-heartbeat-v1-was-so-simple/ On 09/10/2013, at 9:15 PM, Emre He <emre.he@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > as you know, we can config pacemaker service in corosync.conf, and use Pacemaker for resource management, monitoring. > > service { > # Load the Pacemaker Cluster Resource Manager > name: pacemaker > ver: 1 > } > > > my question is could Corosync support to manage/monitor resources without Pacemaker? and what's is the "service" definition format? > > for example Heartbeat v3 has the simple functionality to manage resources without Pacemaker (no resource monitoring). The reason I ask this question is because we have not much resources to manage and monitor, i think we can eliminate the system complexity if we do not introduce Pacemaker as resource management. > > thanks, > Emre > > _______________________________________________ > discuss mailing list > discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.corosync.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.corosync.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
